MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983723584 · doi:10.1037/a0030936

Making room for sleep: The relevance of sleep to psychology and the rationale for development of preventative sleep education programs for children and adolescents in the community.

2013· article· en· W1983723584 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Reut Gruber

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAmerican Sleep Medicine Foundation
KeywordsSleep (system call)Relevance (law)PsychologyCognitionAffect (linguistics)Clinical psychologyApplied psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractSleep plays a key role in the way that people think, feel, and behave and is a component of each of these domains. A substantial body of evidence indicates that an appropriate level of sleep is necessary for optimization of physical, cognitive, and emotional functioning, which are key domains of healthy adjustment and are at the heart of the science and the practice of psychology. Conversely, fatigue and insufficient sleep negatively affect these life domains, each of which must function well to ensure optimal development. However, a considerable proportion of children and adolescents do not achieve adequate sleep, in terms of either quantity or quality. Appropriate use of the knowledge regarding the importance of sleep for optimization of physical, cognitive, and emotional functioning may significantly improve youth performance and health. Despite this need for optimal sleep health, extensive translation of available knowledge for the benefit of Canadian youth is currently lacking. This is important, because it is likely that a key means of using existing information to improve the health and success of children is being overlooked. The objectives of this article are therefore to discuss the relevance of sleep to psychology, to provide information regarding sleep and its impact on daytime functioning and development, and to discuss the rational for developing preventative sleep education programs, as well as major barriers to effective sleep education and strategies that can be used to overcome such problems.Keywords: sleep, prevention, children, adolescents, community, developmentIn the present article, I first discuss the relevance of sleep to psychology. I next provide information regarding sleep and its impact on daytime functioning and development. I then discuss the rational for developing preventative sleep education programs. Finally, I discuss the major barriers to effective sleep education and strategies that can be used to overcome such problems; I include examples of the successful use of such strategies to facilitate healthy sleep education.Why Is Sleep Relevant to Psychology?Psychology is defined in the Concise Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica to be a Scientific discipline that studies mental processes and behaviour in humans and other animals. [:] 'the study of the mind' (psychology, 2013). The Canadian Psychological Association (CPA; n.d., para. 2) states that Psychologists engage in research, practice and teaching across a wide range of topics having to do with how people think, feel and behave.Sleep plays a key role in the way that people think, feel, and behave and is a component of all of the psychological domains mentioned previously. A substantial body of evidence indicates that an appropriate level of sleep is necessary for optimization of physical (Hasler et al., 2004; Nixon et al., 2008), cognitive (Alhola & Polo-Kantola, 2007; Durmer & Dinges, 2005; Nilsson et al., 2005; Wimmer, Hoffmann, Bonato, & Moffitt, 1992), and emotional functioning (Gregory & Sadeh, 2012), which are key domains of healthy adjustment and are at the heart of the science and the practice of psychology. Study of sleep is interdisciplinary in nature and overlaps with several domains of psychology, including neuroscience, developmental psychology, clinical child psychology educational and school psychology, and health psychology.Sleep deprivation is very prevalent in children at all stages of development, from infancy to late adolescence. Sizable proportions of children and adolescents obtain less sleep than they need and are thus chronically sleep-deprived (National Sleep Foundation, 2006; Spilsbury et al., 2004). Because the significance of chronic sleep insufficiency is underrecognized in terms of the influence thereof on the mental and physical health of youth, I will focus below on pediatric sleep, that is, sleep in children and adolescents. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienneSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207