MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983800261 · doi:10.1080/14427591.2003.9686505

Workers Without Work: Injured Workers and Well‐Being

2003· article· en· W1983800261 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Occupational Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersUniversity of AucklandNorthwestern University
KeywordsWork (physics)Context (archaeology)Theme (computing)Face (sociological concept)Identity (music)Social psychologyPsychologyOccupational scienceWell-beingSociologyOccupational therapyAestheticsSocial scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper focuses on the views of injured workers in Northwestern Ontario to show that when individuals are deprived of the opportunity to engage in occupations that they find meaningful, their sense of well‐being suffers. Injured workers were interviewed to learn how they cope with their situation and a prominent theme to emerge was the strength of a worker identity even in the face of being unable to work as before. The paper reviews evidence that they strive to maintain a sense of themselves as “good” workers, and evidence that this is difficult, as significant others regard them differently because they can no longer work as before. This paper also contributes to the “orientations to work” literature by highlighting the importance of taking social context into account when considering worker identities, orientations, and commitments to work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.402 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it