MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984099766 · doi:10.5555/1283383.1283472

Lower bounds on average-case delay for video-on-demand broadcast protocols

2007· article· en· W1984099766 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium on Discrete Algorithms · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCommunication sourceUpper and lower boundsBandwidth (computing)Atomic broadcastVideo on demandMatching (statistics)Computer networkSet (abstract data type)Constant (computer programming)Broadcasting (networking)MathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Video-on-demand broadcast protocols are commonly used to deliver video content to a large uncoordinated set of consumers. Since broadcast protocols are not attuned to individual user requests, some delay in service is unavoidable. The worst-case delay, expressed as a function of the available bandwidth, has been well studied; matching upper and lower bounds have been established in a very general setting. In this paper we turn our attention to average-case delay. We establish asymptotically tight lower bounds on average-case delay in the situation where receiver and sender bandwidths are equal. It follows from our results that existing worst-case-optimal broadcast protocols are, to within a small constant factor, optimal in the average case as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it