MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984099766 · doi:10.5555/1283383.1283472

Lower bounds on average-case delay for video-on-demand broadcast protocols

2007· article· en· W1984099766 on OpenAlexaff
Wei-Lung Dustin Tseng, David Kirkpatrick

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium on Discrete Algorithms · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCommunication sourceUpper and lower boundsBandwidth (computing)Atomic broadcastVideo on demandMatching (statistics)Computer networkSet (abstract data type)Constant (computer programming)Broadcasting (networking)MathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Video-on-demand broadcast protocols are commonly used to deliver video content to a large uncoordinated set of consumers. Since broadcast protocols are not attuned to individual user requests, some delay in service is unavoidable. The worst-case delay, expressed as a function of the available bandwidth, has been well studied; matching upper and lower bounds have been established in a very general setting. In this paper we turn our attention to average-case delay. We establish asymptotically tight lower bounds on average-case delay in the situation where receiver and sender bandwidths are equal. It follows from our results that existing worst-case-optimal broadcast protocols are, to within a small constant factor, optimal in the average case as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.075
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.075
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.019
Open science0.0070.006
Research integrity0.0040.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymposium on Discrete AlgorithmsSame topicAdvanced Graph Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207