Vulnerability of RC Buildings to Progressive Collapse Based on 2003 and 2013 GSA Guidelines
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
U.S. General Service Administration (GSA) published guidelines for the progressive collapse resistance of buildings in 2003 and 2013. There are significant changes introduced in the 2013 edition. The objective of this study was to compare the results of the progressive collapse analysis based on the 2003 and 2013 editions of GSA. For the purpose of the study, a 10-storey reinforced concrete frame building located in Vancouver, Canada was considered in the analysis. Progressive collapse analyses were conducted on a 3-D finite element model of the building in accordance with 2003 GSA and 2013 GSA, respectively. The differences between the two editions were also discussed in the paper, including the loads applied for the analysis and the acceptance criteria for the progressive collapse resistance. Finally, comments were made on the use of the 2013 GSA Guidelines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it