Mathematical modelling and a meta-heuristic for flexible job shop scheduling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study develops new solution methodologies for the flexible job shop scheduling problem (F-JSSP). As a first step towards dealing with this complex problem, mathematical modellings have been used; two novel effective position- and sequence-based mixed integer linear programming (MILP) models have been developed to fully characterise operations of the shop floor. The developed MILP models are capable of solving both partially and totally F-JSSPs. Size complexities, solution effectiveness and computational efficiencies of the developed MILPs are numerically explored and comprehensively compared vis-à-vis the makespan optimisation criterion. The acquired results demonstrate that the proposed MILPs, by virtue of its structural efficiencies, outperform the state-of-the-art MILPs in literature. The F-JSSP is strongly NP-hard; hence, it renders even the developed enhanced MILPs inefficient in generating schedules with the desired quality for industrial scale problems. Thus, a meta-heuristic that is a hybrid of Artificial Immune and Simulated Annealing (AISA) Algorithms has been proposed and developed for larger instances of the F-JSSP. Optimality gap is measured through comparison of AISA’s suboptimal solutions with its MILP exact optimal counterparts obtained for small- to medium-size benchmarks of F-JSSP. The AISA’s results were examined further by comparing them with seven of the best-performing meta-heuristics applied to the same benchmark. The performed comparative analysis demonstrated the superiority of the developed AISA algorithm. An industrial problem in a mould- and die-making shop was used for verification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".