MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984305399 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0659

Solving long time‐horizon dynamic optimal power flow of large‐scale power grids with direct solution method

2014· article· en· W1984305399 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Generation Transmission & Distribution · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsIndependent Electricity System Operator
FundersUniversity of Hong KongNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaResearch Grants Council, University Grants CommitteeNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPower flowScale (ratio)Computer scienceFlow (mathematics)Power (physics)Electric power systemHorizonMathematical optimizationTime horizonControl theory (sociology)MathematicsPhysicsArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic optimal power flow (DOPF) is an extension of optimal power flow for the optimal generation dispatch in a given time‐horizon. The dynamic constraints bring tremendous numerical difficulties in solving this model. With particular attention to handle dynamic constraints, an efficient method has been presented for directly solving the large‐scale DOPF Karush‐Kuhn‐Tucker (KKT) system arising from the primal–dual interior point method. First, the reduced KKT system is derived, showing that dynamic constraints lead to non‐zeros in off‐diagonal parts in the coefficient of KKT system. Then, the efficiency of the algorithm is improved by two measures: (i) to utilise the Cholesky factorisation algorithm, a constant diagonal perturbation is introduced in the positive‐indefinite KKT coefficient and (ii) efficient reordering algorithms are identified and integrated in the sparse direct solver to improve the efficiency. Case studies on the IEEE 118‐bus system over 24–96 time intervals are presented. These case studies show that the proposed method has a significant speed‐up than decomposed interior point methods. The proposed method has also been successfully applied in Chinese realistic large‐scale power grids. Two realistic case studies are reported. Both realistic cases have over 100 000 decision variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it