MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984323565 · doi:10.1111/eci.12169

Impact of hypertension and renin–angiotensin system inhibitors in aortic stenosis

2013· article· en· W1984323565 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Clinical Investigation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineHazard ratioCardiologyRenin–angiotensin systemStenosisObservational studyBlood pressureConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies revealed that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) could play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of aortic stenosis (AS). The objectives of this study were to examine (i) the impact of hypertension on AS progression and clinical events and (ii) the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this observational study, we retrospectively analysed clinical and Doppler echocardiographic data prospectively collected in 338 patients with AS. Patients were separated into four groups: patients without hypertension and not treated by RAS medication (Ctrl group), patients with hypertension but not treated by RAS medication (HTN group), patients treated with ACEIs, and patients treated with ARBs. AS progression rate was assessed by the annualized increase in peak aortic jet velocity. RESULTS: Compared with Ctrl group, patients in HTN group had faster stenosis progression (P = 0·01). Patients on ARBs had slower AS progression compared with Ctrl (trend P = 0·10) and HTN (P = 0·002) groups, whereas patients on ACEIs had similar progression rate compared with Ctrl group (P = NS) but lower compared with HTN group (P = 0·02). On multivariable analysis, compared with Ctrl group, HTN group was associated with faster AS progression rate (P = 0·002), whereas ARBs with slower progression (P = 0·0008). During a mean follow-up of 6·2 ± 2·4 years, HTN (hazard ratio [HR] = 2·45; P = 0·006) and ACEI (HR = 2·30; P = 0·01) groups were associated with a significant increase in all-cause mortality compared with Ctrl group, whereas ARB group (HR: 0·89; P = 0·80) not. In multivariable analysis, HTN and ACEI groups remained associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertension is associated with significantly faster stenosis progression and higher incidence of clinical events in patients with AS. ARBs but not ACEs were found to abolish the increased risk of mortality associated with hypertension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it