Lanczos, Householder transformations, and implicit deflation for fast and reliable dominant singular subspace computation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Many applications, such as subspace‐based models in information retrieval and signal processing, require the computation of singular subspaces associated with the k dominant, or largest, singular values of an m × n data matrix A , where k ≪min( m , n ). Frequently, A is sparse or structured, which usually means matrix–vector multiplications involving A and its transpose can be done with much less than 𝒪( mn ) flops, and A and its transpose can be stored with much less than 𝒪( mn ) storage locations. Many Lanczos‐based algorithms have been proposed through the years because the underlying Lanczos method only accesses A and its transpose through matrix–vector multiplications. We implement a new algorithm, called KSVD, in the Matlab environment for computing approximations to the singular subspaces associated with the k dominant singular values of a real or complex matrix A . KSVD is based upon the Lanczos tridiagonalization method, the WY representation for storing products of Householder transformations, implicit deflation, and the QR factorization. Our Matlab simulations suggest it is a fast and reliable strategy for handling troublesome singular‐value spectra. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it