MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984792020 · doi:10.1109/acc.2012.6315006

Fault detection and isolation of dissipative parabolic PDEs: Finite-dimensional geometric approach

2012· article· en· W1984792020 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Baniamerian, K. Khorasani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdePartial differential equationNonlinear systemDissipative systemMathematicsGalerkin methodFault detection and isolationOrdinary differential equationManifold (fluid mechanics)Applied mathematicsMathematical analysisControl theory (sociology)Differential equationComputer scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a nonlinear geometric fault detection and isolation (FDI) method is developed for a system that is governed by a dissipative parabolic partial differential equation (PDE) and that can be approximated by a finite-dimensional ordinary differential equations (ODE). The Galerkin method is employed to derive an approximate ODE which is utilized to design a geometric FDI system. Using singular perturbation theory, it is shown that under certain conditions the designed FDI system can detect and isolate faults corresponding to the original PDE. In addition, the Approximate Inertial Manifold (AIM) concept is used to improve the performance of the designed FDI filter. It is shown that by using the AIM-based approach, one can accomplish fault detection to an arbitrary degree of accuracy, although this technique cannot improve the fault isolation problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern FormationFrench-language works237,207