MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985018928 · doi:10.1137/s1064827599356638

Extensible Lattice Sequences for Quasi-Monte Carlo Quadrature

2000· article· en· W1985018928 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Approximation and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodMathematicsLattice (music)Pseudorandom number generatorQuasi-Monte Carlo methodQuadrature (astronomy)Monte Carlo integrationStatistical physicsHybrid Monte CarloApplied mathematicsAlgorithmStatisticsPhysicsMarkov chain Monte Carlo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integration lattices are one of the main types of low discrepancy sets used in quasi-Monte Carlo methods. However, they have the disadvantage of being of fixed size. This article describes the construction of an infinite sequence of points, the first bm of which forms a lattice for any nonnegative integer m. Thus, if the quadrature error using an initial lattice is too large, the lattice can be extended without discarding the original points. Generating vectors for extensible lattices are found by minimizing a loss function based on some measure of discrepancy or nonuniformity of the lattice. The spectral test used for finding pseudorandom number generators is one important example of such a discrepancy. The performance of the extensible lattices proposed here is compared to that of other methods for some practical quadratureproblems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score0.895

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it