MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985607758 · doi:10.1021/ie0492101

Modeling and Optimization of Product Appearance:  Application to Injection-Molded Plastic Panels

2005· article· en· W1985607758 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProcess (computing)Product (mathematics)Quality (philosophy)Artificial intelligenceObstacleNondeterministic algorithmComputer visionProcess engineeringMathematicsAlgorithmEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new machine vision approach for estimating, monitoring, and controlling manufactured product appearance is illustrated. This new approach consists of the following: (1) extraction of textural information from product images, (2) estimation of measures of the visual quality of the product from the textural information extracted, (3) modeling causal relationships between the estimated quality and process variables, and (4) optimization of new operating conditions using the causal model. This method is specifically aimed at treating the stochastic nature in the visual appearance of many manufactured products. This nondeterministic nature of product appearance has been a main obstacle for the success of machine vision in the process industries. This approach is successfully applied to an industrial process for estimation, modeling and optimization of the visual appearance of injection-molded plastic panels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it