MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985735184 · doi:10.1039/c001897j

Luminescence and reactivity of 7-azaindole derivatives and complexes

2010· review· en· W1985735184 on OpenAlexaff
Shu‐Bin Zhao, Suning Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Society Reviews · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReactivity (psychology)ChemistrySteric effectsBimetallic stripPhosphorescenceCooperativityLuminescenceCoordination complexCombinatorial chemistryPhotochemistryChelationMetalInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceFluorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

7-Azaindole and its derivatives have been extensively investigated for uses in biological probes and imaging. In contrast, there have been very limited studies on the coordination chemistry and the applications of 7-azaindole and derivatives in materials science and in chemical bond activation. Our recent research has shown that 7-azaindolyl and derivatives are excellent blue emitters for organic light emitting diodes, they have rich coordination chemistry with both main group elements and transition metal ions, and their metal complexes display not only phosphorescence but also unusual and often unprecedented reactivity toward C-H and C-X bonds. This critical review discusses recent advances in these fields with focuses on new 7-azaindolyl derivatives and their metal complexes developed by our group. The luminescent properties and applications of 7-azaindolyl-based compounds will be presented. The reactivity of Pt(II) complexes toward C-H and C-X bonds, especially the steric impact of the bis(7-azaindolyl) chelate ligands and bimetallic cooperativity will be discussed (86 references).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations97
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Society ReviewsSame topicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes ResearchFrench-language works237,207