MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985800477 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2014.6854462

Improving the tracking ability of KRLS using Kernel Subspace Pursuit

2014· article· en· W1985800477 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKernel (algebra)Subspace topologyTracking (education)WeightComputer scienceAlgorithmSupport vector machineArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new Kernel Recursive Least Squares (KRLS) algorithm that is able to efficiently track time-varying systems. In order to alleviate the detrimental effect of a large dictionary size on the algorithm's tracking ability, we decouple the equality between dictionary size and weight vector size, an equality that has been encountered in all previous KRLS algorithms. In the proposed method, the maximum size of the weight vector is fixed and is independent from the dictionary size. We introduce the Kernel Subspace Pursuit algorithm which we use to choose a subset of the dictionary that tracks best the most recent received data samples. The selected dictionary elements are then used in the KRLS iterations. We show through simulations that our algorithm outperforms existing KRLS algorithms in tracking time-varying systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.587
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207