MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985930887 · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2014.7004364

Applying instance-weighted support vector machines to class imbalanced datasets

2014· article· en· W1985930887 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupport vector machineMachine learningComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceBoosting (machine learning)Benchmark (surveying)Class (philosophy)Data mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Learning with class imbalance is always a challenging task in many real world applications such as the Internet, surveillance, security, and finance. Like many other successful machine learning algorithms, the success of the support vector machine (SVM) is limited when it is applied to the problem of learning from imbalanced datasets. SVM with different error costs has been widely used to deal with the class imbalanced problem. In this paper, we are trying to apply an instance-weighted variant of the SVM with both 1-norm and 2-norm format to deal with the class imbalance problem. We develop an asymmetric boosting method on the weights of the tradeoff parameters to optimize the instance-weighted SVM. The experimental results on the benchmark datasets show that the proposed algorithm is effective on the class imbalanced problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImbalanced Data Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207