MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985969565 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450790612

<i>N</i>‐arylhydroxamic acids as mineral collectors for ore‐beneficiation

2001· article· en· W1985969565 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur-Containing Compounds
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBeneficiationPyriteMineralChemistryZincCopperIron oreAlkylTonneMineral processingMetallurgyMineralogyMaterials scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Several arylhydroxamic acids were synthesized, characterized and tested as collectors in the flotation of a Cu‐Zn sulphide ore. Arylhydroxamic acids floated copper in preference to iron and zinc minerals. Substitution in the N ‐phenyl ring increased the efficiency of the collector. However, increase in alkyl‐chain beyond C 6 in the acyl group decreased the flotation efficiency of the collector. N ‐butanoylphenylhydroxylamine was found to give the best result and floated about 93 wt% of Cu in about 32 wt% of the feed taken and the collector usage was only about 70 g per tonne of the ore. Pyrite flotation was minimum at pH 11.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it