MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986639910 · doi:10.1002/ppp.578

Dynamics of active‐layer detachment failures, Fosheim Peninsula, Ellesmere Island, Nunavut, Canada

2007· article· en· W1986639910 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePermafrost and Periglacial Processes · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPeninsulaLandslideActive layerFront (military)PermafrostMass movementGeomorphologyOceanographyLayer (electronics)SeismologyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dozens of fresh active‐layer detachments were observed on the Fosheim Peninsula in late‐summer 2005 following one week of high air temperatures and nearly continuous bright sunshine. One of these shallow translational landslides started as a minor movement on an upper, steeper slope segment but over several days its front propagated 250 m downslope at velocities of 2–9 m h −1 . A second, smaller active‐layer detachment developed within less than 2 hours and subsequent movement was limited. Effective stress analyses can explain the initiation of these landslides on moderate gradients. Movements across extremely low‐angled slope segments, however, likely require both dynamic loading from the moving mass and very low basal undrained shear strengths produced by high porewater pressures. The lengthy development of the large active‐layer detachment helps explain stratigraphic and morphologic features previously observed in these slope failures. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it