MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986775333 · doi:10.1177/153303460400300505

Evaluation of Intra- and Inter-fraction Motion in Breast Radiotherapy Using Electronic Portal Cine Imaging

2004· article· en· W1986775333 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology in Cancer Research & Treatment · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiation therapyNuclear medicineFraction (chemistry)BreathingMedicineIrradiationIonization chamberLungWedge (geometry)RadiologyPhysicsChemistryIonizationOpticsAnatomyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breast irradiation is one of the most challenging problems in radiotherapy due to the complex shape of the target volume, proximity of radiation sensitive normal structures and breathing motion. It was the aim of the present study to use electronic portal imaging (EPI) during treatment to determine intra- and inter-fraction motion in patients undergoing radiotherapy and to correlate the magnitude of motion with patient specific parameters. EPI cine images were acquired from the medial tangential fields of twenty radiotherapy patients on a minimum of 5 days each over the course of their treatment. The treatments were administered using 10 MV X-rays and dynamic wedges on a Varian Clinac 2100CD linear accelerator. Depending on the incident dose and the angle of the wedge, between 4 and 16 images could be acquired in one session using an EPI device based on liquid ionization chambers (Varian). The border between lung and chest-wall could be easily detected in all images and quantitative measurements were taken for the amount of lung in the field and the distance of the breast tissue from the field edges. Inter-fraction variability was found to be about twice as large as intra-fraction variability. The largest variability was detected in cranio/caudal direction (intra-fraction: 1.3 +/- 0.4 mm; inter-fraction: 2.6 +/- 1.3 mm) while the lung involvement varied by 1.1 +/- 0.2 mm and 1.8 +/- 0.6 mm intra- and inter-fraction, respectively. This indicates that the effect of breathing motion on the amount of radiated lung was not of major concern in the patients studied. Of other patient specific parameters such as body weight, breast separation, field size and location of the target, only increasing age was significantly correlated with larger inter-fraction motion. Acquisition of EPI cine loops proved to be a quick and easy technique to establish the amount of patient movement during breast radiotherapy. The relatively small variability found in the present pilot study justifies considerations for more conformal dose delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.395 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it