MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987058898 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2014.2349003

A Methodology for Automated Segmentation and Reconstruction of Urban 3-D Buildings from ALS Point Clouds

2014· article· en· W1987058898 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPoint cloudVoronoi diagramRANSACBoundary (topology)Computer scienceGeometric primitivePolygon meshSegmentationIntersection (aeronautics)Data structureMedial axisConsistency (knowledge bases)AlgorithmTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceGeometryImage (mathematics)CombinatoricsComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a methodology which allows automated and efficient reconstruction of three-dimensional (3-D) geometric building models from an Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) point cloud is introduced and its performance is analyzed and evaluated. The proposed method avoids abnormal and/or infinite solutions which are typically encountered in previously published methods that use the rooftop primitive adjacency matrix to solve the critical rooftop vertices. In particular, first, an improved random sample consensus (RANSAC) algorithm is proposed to segment the rooftop primitives, i.e., the planar patches that constitute rooftops, of each building or group of connected buildings. The algorithm successfully maintains topological consistency among primitives and avoids under- and over-segmentation with high efficiency. Second, a novel Voronoi-based primitive boundary extraction algorithm under constraints of outer and inner building boundaries is introduced in order to extract each primitive boundary. In this algorithm, the adjacent segmented primitive relationships among the various primitives are preserved by a subgraph of the Voronoi diagram so that the reconstructed neighbor primitives are seamlessly connected. Third, in order to refine the boundary shapes of primitives with irregular geometry, various criteria for making the boundary adjustments more effective are proposed. In this way, more regular 3-D buildings can be produced. Finally, the primitive boundary simplification criteria are formally introduced to generate compact 3-D building models. By using the simplification criteria, nonadjacency between neighbor primitives, intersection between boundaries, and self-intersections are, to a great extent, avoided. Numerous experimental results obtained using multiple data sets, including data from the cities of Toronto and Enschede as well as from the Niagara area, have shown that the proposed methodology has excellent performance and it can produce watertight 3-D polyhedral building models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it