MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987133329 · doi:10.1145/2661704.2661708

Detection and Visualization of Emotions in an Affect-Aware City

2014· article· en· W1987133329 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAffect (linguistics)VisualizationSentiment analysisDominance (genetics)Social mediaArtificial neural networkEmotion detectionBig dataSpace (punctuation)ArousalArtificial intelligenceHuman–computer interactionEmotion recognitionWorld Wide WebPsychologyData miningSocial psychologyCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smart cities use various deployed sensors and aggregate their data to create a big picture of the live state of the city. This live state can be enhanced by incorporating the affective states of the citizens. In this work, we automatically detect the emotions of the city's inhabitants from geo-tagged posts on the social network Twitter. Emotions are represented as four-dimensional vectors of pleasantness, arousal, dominance and unpredictability. In a training phase, emotion-word hashtags in the messages are used as the ground truth emotion contained in a message. A neural network is trained by using the presence of words, hashtags and emoticons in the messages as features. During the live phase, these features are extracted from new geo-tagged Twitter messages and given as input to the neural network. This allows the estimation of a four-dimensional emotion vector for a new message. The detected emotions are aggregated over space and time and visualized on a map of the city.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it