MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987153375 · doi:10.1109/cse.2014.244

Broadcasting in Harary-Like Graphs

2014· article· en· W1987153375 on OpenAlexaff
Puspal Bhabak, Hovhannes A. Harutyunyan, Shreelekha Tanna

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsVertex (graph theory)LogarithmMathematicsGraphDiscrete mathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Broadcasting is an information dissemination problem in a connected graph in which one vertex, called the originator, must distribute a message to all other vertices by placing a series of calls along the edges of the graph. Every time the informed vertices aid the originator in distributing the message. Finding the broadcast time of any vertex in an arbitrary graph is NP-complete. In this paper we consider the broadcast problem in Harary Graph, Hk, n which was first introduced by Frank Harary. Hk, n is a minimal k-connected graph on n vertices. We present a logarithmic additive approximation to find the broadcast time in an arbitrary Harary graph. For even values of n we also introduce a modified-Harary graph and present a 1-additive approximation algorithm to find the broadcast time. We show the optimality of our algorithm for a particular subclass of modified-Harary graph. Then we also show that modified-Harary graph is a broadcast graph when k is logarithmic of n.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207