MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987521740 · doi:10.1243/09544054jem1472

Sequential metamodelling application to improve porthole die design

2009· article· en· W1987521740 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetamodelingKrigingDesign space explorationSet (abstract data type)Computer scienceBlack boxDifferential evolutionConceptual designEngineering design processDifferential (mechanical device)Mathematical optimizationAlgorithmData miningEngineeringMachine learningArtificial intelligenceMathematicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conventional trial—error method and empirical approaches are time consuming for the design of complex shaped products like porthole dies. These methods are associated with higher production costs, lower efficiency, and design inaccuracies pertaining to ambiguity and uncertainty. Owing to these deficiencies, there is a need for a more reliable and better design approach. In this article, a Kriging metamodel and differential evolution-based random simulation design methodology is proposed in order to reduce the cognitive load on the designer. The proposed methodology helps in selecting the set of parameters to be used to perform a simulation such that an improved design is delivered with reduced time and effort. The combination of the input parameters and their probable effect on the final design is evaluated and provided to the designer beforehand. This information, when juxtaposed with the designer's knowledge, gives greater opportunities to produce an optimal design. The sequential sampling strategy is used to select this set of parameters. It depends on the confidence value: a function of the design variables and the desired performance parameter. A Kriging metamodel is employed for modelling a random simulation of porthole extrusion with different influencing parameters. It converts the black-box region (no information zone in the design space) into a grey region (design space with some available information). Differential evolution (an evolutionary algorithm) is used to search for the black-box region carrying the least information in the design space. Three-dimensional extrusion of aluminium is considered in this article for designing a porthole die. The effect of variation of the design parameters is described, sampling points are generated, and the effective set of parameters are evaluated. The results obtained with the proposed sequential methodology are comparable with the simulation results presented in the literature for porthole extrusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it