MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987780915 · doi:10.1145/1347375.1347379

Compile-time and instruction-set methods for improving floating- to fixed-point conversion accuracy

2008· article· en· W1987780915 on OpenAlexafffund
Tor M. Aamodt, Paul Chow

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNumerical Methods and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceAlgorithmScalingCompile timeFloating pointAdderFixed pointParallel computingSubtractionParameterized complexityInstruction setContext (archaeology)CompilerArithmeticMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes and evaluates compile time and instruction-set techniques for improving the accuracy of signal-processing algorithms run on fixed-point embedded processors. These techniques are proposed in the context of a profile guided floating- to fixed-point compiler-based conversion process. A novel fixed-point scaling algorithm (IRP) is introduced that exploits correlations between values in a program by applying fixed-point scaling, retaining as much precision as possible without causing overflow. This approach is extended into a more aggressive scaling algorithm (IRP-SA) by leveraging the modulo nature of 2's complement addition and subtraction to discard most significant bits that may not be redundant sign-extension bits. A complementary scaling technique (IDS) is then proposed that enables the fixed-point scaling of a variable to be parameterized, depending upon the context of its definitions and uses. Finally, a novel instruction-set enhancement—fractional multiplication with internal left shift(FMLS)—is proposed to further leverage interoperand correlations uncovered by the IRP-SA scaling algorithm. FMLS preserves a different subset of the full product's bits than traditional fractional fixed-point or integer multiplication. On average, FMLS combined with IRP-SA improves accuracy on processors with uniform bitwidth register architectures by the equivalent of 0.61 bits of additional precision for a set of signal-processing benchmarks (up to 2 bits). Even without employing FMLS, the IRP-SA scaling algorithm achieves additional accuracy over two previous fixed-point scaling algorithms by averages of 1.71 and 0.49 bits. Furthermore, as FMLS combines multiplication with a scaling shift, it reduces execution time by an average of 9.8%. An implementation of IDS, specialized to single-nested loops, is found to improve accuracy of a lattice filter benchmark by the equivalent of more than 16-bits of precision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Embedded Computing SystemsSame topicNumerical Methods and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207