The Transition from Veterinary Student to Practitioner: A “Make or Break” Period
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the transition from veterinary student to practitioner, in the context of assessing the outcomes of the veterinary degree program in which the students were trained. Questionnaires were sent to all registered veterinarians who graduated from Massey University between 2001 and 2003 and the heads of human resources of all veterinary practices in New Zealand. These groups, together with veterinarians who had graduated from Massey University between 1993 and 2000, were also invited to participate in focus groups or interviews. Replies were received from 64 graduates and 114 employers. In addition, 115 veterinarians were interviewed or joined focus groups. Most participants thought that the veterinary degree program at Massey University provided a strong basis in scientific theory and clinical reasoning, but was lacking in communication skills training. Clinical exposure was regarded as less than optimal, but adequate for starting practice and as much as could be achieved within the duration of the program. Graduates and employers both recognized the pivotal importance of the first year in practice in the careers of veterinarians. Most graduates had positive experiences of their first year, but for those whose experiences were negative, they were often strongly so. Situations in which confidence and clinical competence could be developed in a supportive environment were associated with positive outcomes. The first year after graduation was regarded by graduates and employers as a "make or break" period. Many of the changes that the veterinary profession is currently experiencing, particularly in terms of the demographics of its entrants, impact upon this first post-graduation year.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".