MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987875940 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggt255

Gradient and smoothness regularization operators for geophysical inversion on unstructured meshes

2013· article· en· W1987875940 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolygon meshComputer scienceRegularization (linguistics)AlgorithmInverse problemInversion (geology)UniquenessMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsGeologyMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The non-uniqueness of the underdetermined inverse problem requires that any available geological information be incorporated to constrain the results. Such information commonly comes in the form of a geological model comprising unstructured wireframe surfaces. Hence, we perform geophysical modelling on unstructured meshes, which provide the flexibility required to efficiently incorporate complicated geological information. Designing spatial matrix operators for unstructured meshes is a non-trivial task. Gradient operators are required for powerful inversion regularization schemes that allow for the incorporation of geological information. Other authors have developed simple regularization schemes for unstructured meshes but those approaches do not use true gradient operators and do not allow for the incorporation of structural information. In this paper we develop new methods for generating spatial gradient operators on unstructured meshes. Our approach is essentially to fit a linear trend in a small neighbourhood around each cell. This results in a small linear system of equations to solve for each cell. Solving for the linear trend parameters yields the required information to construct the stationary gradient operators. Care must be taken when setting up the linear systems to avoid potential numerical issues. We test and compare our methods against the rectilinear mesh equivalents using some simple illustrative 2-D synthetic examples. Our methods are then applied to more complicated 2-D and 3-D examples, including real earth scenarios. This work provides a new method for regularizing inversions on unstructured meshes while allowing for the incorporation of structural orientation information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it