Rocking the Kasbah: Insurrectional Politics, the “Arab Streets”, and Global Revolution in the 21st Century
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes This special forum emerged from a discussion in the "spontaneous correspondence" of Globalization's editorial board at the Annual International Studies Association Conference in Montreal, March 18, 2011. We came forward as guest editors and agreed to solicit further articles. Special thanks to the board. Thanks also to Barry K. Gills for his careful reading of all articles including this introduction and his excellent editorial comments. All pieces have benefited from his comments. Special thanks to William D. Coleman and Jan Scholte for suggesting authors. Finally, thanks to Jolene Butt and Jayne Kay for seeing through the completion of this special forum and a very special thanks to Elizabeth Thompson for her careful editing suggestions. Some have argued that the revolutions were about Karama which in Arabic means honor, dignity, esteem, standing prestige. See Anis al-Shoaibi, a revolutionary from Tunisia who said (2011): "Hiya thawrat karama" ("this is a revolution of honor"). Johnny West (2011) West, J. 2011. Karama! Journeys Through the Arab Spring: Exhilarating Encounters with Those who Sparked a Revolution, London: Heron Books. [Google Scholar] Karama! Journeys Through Arab Spring: Exhilarating encounters with those who sparked a revolution (Heron Books). Additional informationNotes on contributorsNevzat SogukThe authors are listed alphabetically following academic convention. They have both contributed equally to the writing of this Introduction
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it