MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987990398 · doi:10.1353/mou.0.0015

A Companion to Greek Tragedy (review)

2007· article· en· W1987990398 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
C. W. Marshall

Bibliographic record

VenueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTragedy (event)Context (archaeology)Greek tragedySkepticismHistoryLiteraturePityArtPhilosophyClassicsEpistemologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: A Companion to Greek Tragedy C.W. Marshall Justina Gregory, ed. A Companion to Greek Tragedy. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. Maldon, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2005. Pp. xviii + 552. $186.99. ISBN 978-1-4051-0770-9 (cloth). The thirty-one papers in this collection form the richest single-volume introduction to an aspect of the ancient world that I have read. The range of contributions is immense, and each paper could be used as a starting-point for further study of Athenian tragedy (each chapter possesses a bibliography of “further reading”). The book is divided into four parts—“Contexts,” “Elements,” “Approaches,” and “Reception”—and it is helpful to consider the papers within these groups. The wide-ranging nature of the volume—and the limitations of the academic review—means that only superficial comment is possible for most contributions. The first part, “Contexts,” consists of seven chapters. Three represent generalist summaries of the author’s previously published views. Scott Scullion (23–37) provides a well-argued account that is honest [End Page 253] about the marginality of the perspective expressed but rigorous in its clear articulation of key aspects of the origin of tragedy. Jocelyn Penny Small (103–118) offers a skeptical view on the relationship between vase illustrations and tragic performance, arguing against the views of Taplin and Green. While additional context from the so-called phlyax vases would, I think, offer helpful counter-evidence, this is a very useful summary. I remain unconvinced, however, by Neil Croally’s defense of tragedy’s didacticism (55–70): he shifts between two senses of “teaching” (as a function of the genre, and as a choice by the playwright), so that the point becomes trivial; everything teaches in this sense. Much stronger is William Allen (71–82) on the philosophical tradition, which (with Halliwell; see below) covers much of the same ground as Croally. Christopher Pelling’s discussion of the role of rhetoric (83–102) demonstrates how performance culture blurs tragedy into the lawcourts, and vice-versa. These two papers are both excellent summaries. Other papers are less compelling. Paula Debnar (3–22) opens the volume with a historical overview of fifth-century Athens, placing selected tragedies in this context, though general readers will be misled by several claims, including the certainty with which the opening paragraph affirms Euphorion’s production of Prometheus in (specifically) 431 (a play treated as Aeschylean at 105, 216, and 326, and inauthentic at 3, 199, and 254). Bernd Seidensticker (38–54) gives a general account of satyr drama, but the description of dithyramb, important for understanding tragic choruses, is minimal. The core of the second part, “Elements,” consists of four discussions on structural aspects of Greek tragedy. Deborah H. Roberts on beginnings and endings (136–148) discusses how the content of tragedy is bounded. For her, the play is the unit of interpretation, and one misses a sense of how the satyr play provides its own kind of ending to the dramatic experience. Michael R. Halleran’s paper on episodes (167–182) describes specific types of scenes and is attuned to the implications for performance. Peter Wilson’s solid, short, provocative discussion of music (183–193) rightly emphasizes the performative implications and the foreignness of Greek music. After carefully defining his vocabulary and terms, Luigi Battezzato (149–166) summarizes the function of lyric and challenges conventional (Aristotelian) views. All four papers are excellent, and together provide a kind of Bauformen der griechischen Tragödie “lite” that will be incredibly useful to English-speaking undergraduates. Less successful is Michael J. Anderson on myth (121–135), which is a bit flat since it does not engage with larger and often misunderstood issues of what myth is. The final paper in this section, John Davidson on performance (194–211), is in the awkward position of having to cover too much ground within a single chapter; as a result, the [End Page 254] discussion is compressed at key points, and alternative possibilities remain under-explored. While many of the papers more than touch on issues of performance, there is too much here to provide a consolidated view, and issues such as the theatre space itself are not...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of CanadaSame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207