MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988073521 · doi:10.1680/gein.2008.15.1.55

Impact on groundwater of concurrent leakage and diffusion of dichloromethane through geomembranes in landfill liners

2008· article· en· W1988073521 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeosynthetics International · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandfill Environmental Impact Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeomembraneGeosynthetic clay linerLeakage (economics)Geotechnical engineeringMechanicsAquiferGroundwaterAdvectionBoundary value problemGeosyntheticsMaterials scienceMass transferEnvironmental scienceGeologySoil scienceSoil waterThermodynamicsMathematicsHydraulic conductivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although intact geomembranes are excellent barriers to fluid flow, there are still two possible pathways for the transport of organic contaminants into the environment: leakage through defects in the geomembrane, and diffusion through the intact geomembrane. Analytical, semi-analytical and numerical techniques for calculating leakage rates have been developed. However, no previous attempt has been made to rigorously model the interaction between leakage through a hole in a wrinkle and diffusion. To address this shortcoming, finite-element analyses in two-dimensional space are performed to simulate the transport of dichloromethane (DCM) through a leaking HPDE geomembrane (GM) for eight cases involving composite liners, including both compacted clay liners and geosynthetic clay liners. Equations of steady-state seepage and time-dependent diffusion-advection in saturated soils are solved. Transport through the GMs is simulated by a novel, mass-conserving equivalent boundary condition that renders the problem computationally more tractable. Results are compared with those obtained from widely used one-dimensional methods, namely the Rowe equation for leakage through a wrinkle and the POLLUTEv7 program for mass transport. It is shown that predictions of leakage and transport by the one-dimensional method (POLLUTEv7) are within a maximum 30% of two-dimensional values under conditions of perfect mixing in the aquifer. When no horizontal mixing is present, concentrations of DCM are found to increase by up to 43% in two-dimensional analyses. It is concluded that one-dimensional analyses are adequate for most practical purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it