MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988313157 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2013.6567840

Time series compression for adaptive chart generation

2013· article· en· W1988313157 on OpenAlexaff
Giuseppe Burtini, Scott Fazackerley, Ramon Lawrence

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceJSONJavaScriptVisualizationAutomatic summarizationWeb applicationXMLClient-sideData visualizationData compressionData miningDatabaseInformation retrievalArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Web content is consumed on smart phones, tablets, and computers with a significant variation in device display resolution. Visualizing data is typically performed by extracting data from a database, packaging it as JSON or XML for transmission to the client and then visualizing with a client-side JavaScript library. A major challenge is to retrieve only the required data for visualization. Current approaches require programmers to manually modify their data extraction queries and do not adapt to client display characteristics. The contribution in this work is a configurable data compression method that automatically adapts the amount of data transmitted for client-side visualization based on device characteristics. We evaluate several different techniques for time series summarization and compression and show that the amount of data transmitted can be reduced by between 40% and 80% while preserving pixel-perfect visualization. Reducing data transmitted improves client responsiveness and allows flexible and responsive web content without programmer intervention. The approach is tested on a wide variety of data sets and is implemented as an add-on for a JavaScript visualization library.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTime Series Analysis and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207