MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intervention for Growth Failure in Children with IBD

2006· article· en· W1988334226 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseInflammationDiseaseLinear growthMalnutritionGrowth factorGrowth retardationIntervention (counseling)PediatricsInternal medicineImmunologyPregnancyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Impairment of linear growth and pubertal development is an important potential complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly Crohn disease, developing during childhood and early to mid-adolescence. Normal growth is a marker of success of therapy. “Normal” children, however, grow at very different rates. Patterns of growth and pubertal progression in young patients with IBD can only be accurately recognized as pathologic, if the variations in normal development of healthy children and adolescents are first appreciated. Prompt recognition of IBD is important in avoiding a long period of growth retardation due to untreated inflammation. The greater the height deficit at diagnosis, the greater is the demand for catch-up growth. In caring for children with IBD, it is important to obtain pre-illness heights, so that the impact of the chronic intestinal inflammation can be fully appreciated. Following diagnosis and institution of treatment, regular measurement and charting of height, together with calculation of height velocity, are central to management. Increased understanding of the mechanisms of linear growth impairment associated with chronic inflammatory disease points the way toward better management. IGF-1, produced by the liver in response to growth hormone (GH) stimulation, is the key mediator of GH effects at the growth plate of bones. The role of genes in influencing the phenotypic expression of IBD, including its propensity for growth impairment, is an intriguing focus of research. Chronic undernutrition has long been implicated and remains an important and remediable contributing factor in the observed growth impairment. Inflammatory cytokines similarly inhibit linear growth through interference with hepatic release of IGF-1 and additionally via direct effects on growing bone. Cytokines also appear to impair end-organ responsiveness to circulating testosterone, thereby compounding the effects of undernutrition in delaying progression through puberty. Chronic daily corticosteroid administration in children augments the growth impairment associated with inflammatory disease. The growth suppressive effects of glucocorticoids are multifactorial, and include central suppression of GH release, decreased hepatic transcription of GH receptor, such that production of IGF-1 is decreased, and decreased IGF-1 binding in cartilage. Hence exogenous corticosteroids create a state of functional GH deficiency. Current pediatric treatment regimens aimed at facilitating growth limit use of corticosteroids via optimization of immunomodulatory drugs, use of enteral nutrition in Crohn disease, and, if necessary, surgery for ulcerative colitis and for intestinal complications of localized Crohn disease. Biologic agents with the potential for mucosal healing hold promise of growth enhancement even among patients with otherwise refractory disease, whose growth was previously compromised. For all interventions, there is a window of opportunity, which must be taken advantage of before puberty is too advanced. Few interventions, however, have been tested in the randomized controlled trial setting in children; the comparative effects of therapies on growth have seldom been rigorously assessed. Instead, growth outcomes have been reported mainly in observational studies. These include retrospective accounts of improved linear growth following intestinal resection, initiation of enteral nutrition, and during infliximab maintenance therapy. Two long-term randomized, controlled maintenance trials have examined the effects of, respectively, cyclical enteral nutrition and 6-mercaptopurine on linear growth. In a multi-center Canadian study, children achieving clinical remission with either prednisone or enteral nutrition, were randomized to receive longterm low dose prednisone on alternate days or exclusive enteral nutrition one month out of four. In this eighteen month study, linear growth was better in the children receiving liquid diet therapy. In the well-known study of Markowitz and colleagues, children with moderate to severe Crohn disease treated with an initial course of prednisone were randomized to receive either concomitant 6-mercaptopurine or placebo. A beneficial effect of 6-mercaptopurine on linear growth was not clearly apparent in this study in spite of the steroid-sparing effect and improved control of intestinal inflammation, perhaps a function of sample size and difficulties inherent in comparing growth rates among patients of varying ages and pubertal stages. Improvement in IGF-1 levels and height velocity have been observed following growth hormone therapy in small numbers of steroid-dependent children with Crohn's disease. Three to six months of testosterone therapy, carefully supervised by paediatric endocrinologists, has been used in boys with extreme delay of puberty and its associated growth spurt. Experience with both these adjunctive hormonal therapies is very limited. Treatment of intestinal inflammation and assurance of adequate nutrition remain of prime importance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it