MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988392272 · doi:10.1198/jasa.2011.tm09654

An Outlier-Robust Fit for Generalized Additive Models With Applications to Disease Outbreak Detection

2011· article· en· W1988392272 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Statistical Association · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutlierGeneralized linear modelGeneralized additive modelEstimatorPoisson distributionStatisticsOutbreakMathematicsGeneralized estimating equationMasking (illustration)Lasso (programming language)EconometricsComputer scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are interested in a class of unsupervised methods to detect possible disease outbreaks, that is, rapid increases in the number of cases of a particular disease that deviate from the pattern observed in the past. The motivating application for this article deals with detecting outbreaks using generalized additive models (GAMs) to model weekly counts of certain infectious diseases. We can use the distance between the predicted and observed counts for a specific week to determine whether an important departure has occurred. Unfortunately, this approach may not work as desired because GAMs can be very sensitive to the presence of a small proportion of observations that deviate from the assumed model. Thus, the outbreak may affect the predicted values causing these to be close to the atypical counts, and thus mask the outliers by having them appear not to be too extreme or atypical. We illustrate this phenomenon with influenza-like-illness doctor-visits data from the United States for the 2006–2008 flu seasons. One way to avoid this masking problem is to derive an algorithm to fit GAM models that can resist the effect of a small number of atypical observations. In this article we discuss such an outlier-robust fit for GAMs based on the backfitting algorithm. The basic idea is to replace the maximum likelihood based weights used in the generalized local scoring algorithm with those derived from robust quasi-likelihood equations (Cantoni and Ronchetti 2001b). These robust estimators for generalized linear models work well for the Poisson family of distributions, and also for binomial distributions with relatively large numbers of trials. We show that the resulting estimated mean function is resistant to the presence of outliers in the response variable and that it also remains close to the usual GAM estimator when the data do not contain atypical observations. We illustrate the use of this approach on the detection of the recent outbreak of H1N1 flu by looking at the weekly counts of influenza-like-illness (ILI) doctor visits, as reported through the U.S. Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet), and also apply our method to the numbers of requested isolates in Canada. Weeks with a sudden increase in ILI visits or requested isolates are much more clearly identified as atypical by the robust fit because the observed counts are far from the ones predicted by the fitted GAM model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it