MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988394897 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2013.6554664

Resource allocation in a K-user wireless broadcast system with N-layer superposition coding

2013· article· en· W1988394897 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputational complexity theoryWirelessFadingResource allocationCoding (social sciences)MaximizationMathematical optimizationPhysical layerChannel (broadcasting)ThroughputAlgorithmComputer networkMathematicsTelecommunicationsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the resource allocation problem in a K-user wireless broadcast system with N-layer superposition coding (SPC). The problem is formulated as a sumutility maximization problem based on the average throughput. Using stochastic approximation, iteratively solving an approximated problem yields the optimality. The approximated problem can be solved by selecting the user group with the maximal weighted-sum-rate, which has a high computational complexity. Two low-complexity suboptimal algorithms are proposed. The simulation results show that the SPC gain highly depends on the variability of the channel and the SNR range of users. SPC is more favourable in the scenario with small-variation fast-fading channel and a large SNR range of users. The performance of the proposed low-complexity algorithms are close to the optimal solution, and the SPC gain achieved is substantial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207