MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988526964 · doi:10.3406/carav.2004.1488

Patriotismo, Geografía y Astronomía en la coyuntura independentista de la Nueva Granada (1808-1810)

2004· article· en· W1988526964 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCaravelle · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistory and Politics in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisAssertionColonial periodAutonomyHumanitiesIdentity (music)Period (music)ColonialismIndependence (probability theory)EthnologyGeographySociologyPolitical scienceArtArchaeologyComputer scienceLawAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT- At the end of the colonial period, the creóle sectors of New Granada integrate the fundamental categories of modern sciences and apply them to their reading of the country's geography. In this way, they acquire an autonomy which allows them to produce facts about the territory, apart from those of the European and Spanish scientists. At the same time, through scientific talk, they assert their social superiority over the natives, Afro Americans and metis. But the assertion of their creóle identity didn't come into conflict with their varied attachments towards Spain. Therefore the idea we propose here is that geographic knowledge at the end of the colonial period is not one of the causes of the independence process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it