MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989016864 · doi:10.1056/nejmp068178

The Continuing Risk of Transfusion-Transmitted Infections

2006· letter· en· W1989016864 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueNew England Journal of Medicine · 2006
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBlood donation and transfusion practices
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster University Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlood transfusionWest Nile virusTransmission (telecommunications)VirologyFood and drug administrationIncubation periodVirusBlood supplyEnvironmental healthIntensive care medicineImmunologyIncubationSurgeryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2002, as mosquitoes carried West Nile virus across the United States, infecting 4200 people, 23 confirmed cases of transfusion-transmitted infection and 7 related deaths were reported.1 This was a dramatic demonstration that an emerging agent can threaten the safety of the blood supply. Because the virus's incubation period is usually 3 to 15 days and transmission by transfusion stood out against the background of a mosquito-borne epidemic, these transmissions were recognized quickly, nucleic acid–amplification technology was adapted for the detection of the virus, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Health Canada mandated the screening of donated blood . . .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.616
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it