MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989057490 · doi:10.1093/rpd/nct192

Estimation of dose-area product-to-effective dose conversion factors for neonatal radiography using PCXMC

2013· article· en· W1989057490 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiation Protection Dosimetry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaCancerCare Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEffective dose (radiation)RadiographyAbdomenNuclear medicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dose-area product-to-effective dose (E) conversion factors for chest, abdomen and abdomen-chest neonatal radiographs were computed. Seven patient models in the Monte Carlo software, PCXMC, were defined, representing neonates ranging in weight from 0.5 to 6.0 kg. Conversion factors for a tube potential range of 50-80 kVp at two beam filtrations (3.0 mm Al and 3.0 mm Al+0.1 mm Cu) were calculated. For 133 neonatal radiographs, effective dose values determined using these conversion factors were compared with those obtained from PCXMC simulations customised for each radiograph. For a 3.0-kg newborn irradiated at 60 kVp/3.0 mm Al beam filtration, the conversion factors were 2.58, 1.90 and 1.91 μSv (mGy cm(2))(-1) for chest, chest-abdomen and abdomen radiographs, respectively. Average dose difference between the conversion factors and customised dose calculations was 16 %. Disagreement in effective dose was most strongly correlated with under-collimation in the lateral direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it