MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989618424 · doi:10.1145/1005285.1005321

Maximal quotient rational reconstruction

2004· article· en· W1989618424 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Monagan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPolynomial and algebraic computation
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModuloMathematicsInteger (computer science)QuotientRational numberProduct (mathematics)Discrete mathematicsImage (mathematics)CombinatoricsBinary logarithmAlgorithmComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let n/d ∈ Q, m be a positive integer and let u = n/d mod m. Thus $u$ is the image of a rational number modulo m. The rational reconstruction problem is; given u and m find n/d. A solution was first given by Wang in 1981. Wang's algorithm outputs n/d when m > 2 M2 where M = max(|n|,d). Because of the wide application of this algorithm in computer algebra, several authors have investigated its practical efficiency and asymptotic time complexity.In this paper we present a new solution which is almost optimal in the following sense; with controllable high probability, our algorithm will output n/d when m is a modest number of bits longer than 2 |n| d. This means that in a modular algorithm where m is a product of primes, the modular algorithm will need one or two primes more than the minimum necessary to reconstruct n/d; thus if |n| ⇐ d or d ⇐ |n| the new algorithm saves up to half the number of primes. Further, our algorithm will fail with high probability when m < 2 |n| d.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPolynomial and algebraic computationFrench-language works237,207