ORCHESTRATING OBSERVATORY, LABORATORY, AND FIELD: JULES JANSSEN, THE SPECTROSCOPE, AND TRAVEL
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract title SUMMARY /title In the last third of the nineteenth century, astrospectroscopy played a prominent part in orchestrating transitions undergone by three sites of knowledge production: the observatory, the laboratory, and the field expedition. Early astrophysicists carved out for themselves a specific social space by adopting experimental techniques and practices stemming out of the laboratory, and adapting them to the observatory and the field traditions, and more generally by easing the back-and-forth transfer of practices from one site to another. Taking advantage of the circulation culture constitutive of the observatory sciences, the 'new astronomy' provides a useful standpoint from which historians can examine anew the 'institutional revolution' in the laboratory sciences in chemistry, physics, and physiology. To exemplify this process, the French reception of Bunsen and Kirchhoff's work and Jules Janssen's trip to Italy in 1862-1863 are here discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it