Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Multi-component Intervention to Improve Health in an Inner-city Havana Community
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ecosystem approach to human health was applied to guide an evaluation of the effectiveness of a multi-component intervention to improve quality of life and health in an inner-city Havana community. A pre- versus post-intervention analysis was carried out in the study community of Cayo Hueso, and Colon, a concurrent comparison community. A household survey of 1,703 individuals was conducted in 30 neighborhoods, equally divided between the two areas. Greater improvements in housing, local infrastructure, and exposure to risk were perceived to have occurred in the targeted community, more so from the perspective of benefit to the community rather than with regard to the residents' own households. Improvements in some lifestyle-related risk factors and self-rated health in the most vulnerable subgroups (elderly and adolescents) were also achieved. Overall, the Cayo Hueso Plan was considered highly successful in improving the quality of life amid difficult circumstances. Its lessons are being embraced by other communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it