MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990084070 · doi:10.5555/2591272.2591287

MixApart: decoupled analytics for shared storage systems

2013· article· en· W1990084070 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFile and Storage Technologies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Storage Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAnalyticsWorkflowDatabaseWorkloadData analysisInformation repositoryScheduling (production processes)Computer data storageEnterprise data managementData managementDistributed computingOperating systemEnterprise information systemData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed file systems built for data analytics and enterprise storage systems have very different functionality requirements. For this reason, enabling analytics on enterprise data commonly introduces a separate analytics storage silo. This generates additional costs, and inefficiencies in data management, e.g., whenever data needs to be archived, copied, or migrated across silos.MixApart uses an integrated data caching and scheduling solution to allow MapReduce computations to analyze data stored on enterprise storage systems. The front-end caching layer enables the local storage performance required by data analytics. The shared storage back-end simplifies data management.We evaluate MixApart using a 100-core Amazon EC2 cluster with micro-benchmarks and production workload traces. Our evaluation shows that MixApart provides (i) up to 28% faster performance than the traditional ingest-then-compute workflows used in enterprise IT analytics, and (ii) comparable performance to an ideal Hadoop setup without data ingest, at similar cluster sizes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it