MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990124157 · doi:10.1149/1.3271363

Effect of Operating Backpressure on PEM Fuel Cell Performance

2009· article· en· W1990124157 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsBC Innovation CouncilNational Research Council Canada
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellDielectric spectroscopyCyclic voltammetryFuel cellsMaterials scienceElectrical impedanceMass transferElectrodeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Operating temperatureChemistryChemical engineeringNuclear engineeringElectrical engineeringElectrochemistryChromatographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the effects of operating backpressure on PEM fuel cell performance were studied at 70 ºC, 100% RH, and backpressures ranging from 1.00 to 3.04 atm. AC impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry were employed to diagnose the backpressure effects. It was observed that increasing operating backpressure could improve fuel cell performance by enhancing the fuel cell thermodynamics, increasing the exchange current densities of the reactions, accelerating the electrode kinetics, and improving the mass transfer process. However, some negative effects, such as increased H2 crossover rate and membrane resistance, were also observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it