MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990733462 · doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367390409

The Role of Dominance in the Appeal of Violent Media Depictions

2010· article· en· W1990733462 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advertising · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepictionAppealAdvertisingMedia contentDominance (genetics)Context (archaeology)Consumption (sociology)Media consumptionScope (computer science)PropositionPsychologySocial psychologyCriminologySociologyPolitical scienceBusinessHistoryLawSocial scienceArtEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research related to violent media has overwhelmingly focused on the consequences of exposure, typically with a view to informing its regulation. Such media is extremely popular, yet little research has examined why it should be appealing to consumers. The current work examines violent consumption in the context of advertisements for violent video games. We argue that it is not the violence endemic to many of these games, and indeed other media, that is rewarding, but rather the domination that often accompanies such depictions. We test this basic proposition by manipulating the dominative content of a violent depiction. We also examine conditions that moderate the scope of this effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it