MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991089981 · doi:10.1109/sips.2006.352554

Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Carrier Frequency Offset in Correlated MIMO OFDM Systems

2006· article· en· W1991089981 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSiPS ... design and implementation - IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarrier frequency offsetOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingEstimatorRayleigh fadingAlgorithmMIMOMaximum likelihoodComputer scienceMIMO-OFDMFadingChannel (broadcasting)Frequency offsetStatisticsMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses maximum likelihood (ML) carrier frequency offset (CFO) estimation based on virtual subcarriers for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems employing orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) over Rayleigh fading channels. In our ML approach, the channel and data are treated as random variables, unlike existing ML approaches in which the channel and data are treated as unknown constants. This in turn enables us to incorporate the spatial correlation and transmit data correlation into the analysis. In particular, we derive closed-form cost functions which can be used to accurately estimate the CFO. We also derive the Cram r-Rao lower bounds (CRLBs) for these estimators. We show that the presence of these correlations does not impact the CFO estimation significantly, especially at high signal-to-noise ratio. We present several examples to support the analysis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it