MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991761577 · doi:10.1177/1548512913509033

Solving the Impediment Induced Variable Shape Covering Problem

2013· article· en· W1991761577 on OpenAlexaffabout
B. Arbour, P. Massel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Search Problems
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVariable (mathematics)Circle packingConstant (computer programming)Operations researchMathematical optimizationNorm (philosophy)MathematicsGeometryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given finite resources, organizations are in a constant struggle to satisfy conflicting demands for resource allocation. Finding the right number of response units needed to respond to an incident in a given area is one such problem. Different geographical areas have different characteristics that further complicate the problem. For example, Canada’s Arctic waters is a large area with many islands and where varying ice coverage conditions are the norm. These impediments complicate what would otherwise be a straightforward application of the Circle Packing or Circle Covering Problem. The authors propose to call such a problem the Impediment Induced Variable Shape Covering Problem and present the Incident Response Model that determines the minimum number of units needed to respond to an incident anywhere in a given Area of Interest within a predetermined response time while avoiding or accounting for impediments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology TechnologySame topicOptimization and Search ProblemsFrench-language works237,207