MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991843902 · doi:10.3138/sem.v40.3.207

Surfing for Eastern Difference: Ostalgie, Identity, and Cyberspace

2004· article· en· W1991843902 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyberspaceThe InternetAgency (philosophy)GermanPopulationIdentity (music)Media studiesPolitical scienceSociologyHistoryWorld Wide WebDemographyArtSocial scienceComputer scienceAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years the Internet, or cyberspace, has become an increasingly important part of everyday life for a growing proportion of the world's population. Although at present the demographic of Internet usage in Germany remains predominantly male, educated, under forty, and Western, this is beginning to change. A recent Focus article suggested, for example, that more and more women are now using the Internet (Focus Online). However, the most rapidly changing aspect of Internet usage in Germany seems to be the increasing number of East Germans who are going online. As an article in 2002 in Spiegel put it, Langsam, aber sicher holt der Osten digital auf. Based on the findings of the DENIC agency, Spiegel reported that the number of World Wide Web (WWW) addresses registered in the new Lander was up by 50% in 2001, whereas elsewhere in Germany the number sank by up to 20% (Aufhholjagd bei De-Domains). One of the effects of this increased usage of the Internet by East Germans has been a growing number of Web pages dealing East German issues and in particular the question of how to deal with the GDR period. This development, however, has been greeted a degree of alarm by some members of the p ress. The most prominent writer in Germany on this topic is the journalist Henryk M. Broder. In his usual polemical manner, Broder follows a popular conception of the Internet as a potentially dangerous Wild West populated by sexual deviants and political extremists, in which the normal rules of civilization do not apply and from which the vulnerable members of society must be protected (Miller 57). Broder's articles tend towards an image of the Web as being almost taken over by extremist East German cells. He even refers to sites where one can ostensibly rearm for any coming revolution, buying Eine Kalaschnikow fur 98 Euro (Eine Kalaschnikow). Elsewhere he suggests that, as well as giving extremist fringe voices a platform, German society's response to Internet usage by some East Germans seems to turn normal values of justice on their head. He reports, for example, the case of Mario Falcke, a former victim of the Stasi who now runs the Website Stasiopferde and who was threatened legal action for including a link to a site that published a list of Stasi members: Der Berliner Datenschutzbeauftragte interveniert zu Gunsten ehemaliger Stasi-Mitarbeiter und setzt ein Opfer des DDR-Regimes unter Druck, the article claims (Broder, Empfindliche Strafen). Leaving aside the rights and wrongs of this

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it