MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991857267 · doi:10.2989/16073600009485989

The spectral theory of commutative C<sup>∗</sup>-algebras: The constructive spectrum

2000· article· en· W1991857267 on OpenAlexaff
Bernhard Banaschewski, Christopher J. Mulvey

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaestiones Mathematicae · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopos theoryMathematicsHausdorff spaceMultiplicative functionCommutative propertyLocally compact spaceCompact spaceSpectrum (functional analysis)Locale (computer software)Pure mathematicsBanach algebraDiscrete mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldBanach space

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces the notion of a commutative C∗-algebra in a Grothendieck topos E and subsequently that of the spectrum MFn A of A, presented as the locale determined by an appropriate propositional theory in the topos E which describes the basic properties of a multplicative linear functional on A. Further, the locale CE of complex numbers in the topos E is defined in a similar manner and some of its basic properties are established, such as its complete regularity and the compactness of the unit square in CE. Finally, it is shown that the locale MFn A is compact and completely regular, extending the classical result that the multiplicative linear functionals on a commutative C∗-algebra form a compact Hausdorff space in the weak∗ topology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaestiones MathematicaeSame topicAdvanced Topics in AlgebraFrench-language works237,207