MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992248893 · doi:10.4153/cmb-2015-025-7

Almost Sure Global Well-posedness for the Fractional Cubic Schrödinger Equation on the Torus

2015· preprint· en· W1992248893 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2015
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTorusNonlinear Schrödinger equationMathematicsInvariant (physics)Schrödinger equationNonlinear systemMeasure (data warehouse)Mathematical physicsMathematical analysisPhysicsQuantum mechanicsComputer scienceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In a previous paper, we proved that the 1-d periodic fractional Schrödinger equation with cubic nonlinearity is locally well-posed in H s for s > 1 − α /2 and globally well-posed for s > 10 α − 1/12. In this paper we define an invariant probability measure μ on H s for s < α − 1/2, so that for any ∊ > 0 there is a set Ω ⊂ H s such that μ (Ω c ) < ∊ and the equation is globally well-posed for initial data in Ω. We see that this fills the gap between the local well-posedness and the global well-posedness range in an almost sure sense for in an almost sure sense.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it