MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992479823 · doi:10.1002/etep.4450120109

Performance of sequence directional elements on MOV protected series compensated transmission lines

2002· article· en· W1992479823 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Transactions on Electrical Power · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsProfessional Engineers OntarioUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitorElectrical impedanceTransmission lineEquivalent impedance transformsOutput impedanceQuarter-wave impedance transformerElectric power transmissionSeries (stratigraphy)Impedance bridgingImage impedanceSequence (biology)Coupling (piping)Time domainVoltageElectrical engineeringEngineeringInput impedanceComputer scienceDamping factorChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Performance of positive and negative sequence directional elements applied to MOV (metal oxide varistor) protected series compensated transmission lines with the relay voltages measured at the line side of the capacitors is investigated in this paper. Both elements basically measure the negative of the equivalent impedance behind the relay for forward faults and the line impedance plus the impedance of the remote source for reverse faults. During faults, the equivalent impedance of MOV/series capacitor combination is generally different for each of the three phases, causing mutual coupling of the sequence components, which may affect accurate impedance measurement. Simulation results indicate that mutual coupling in the sequence domain does not significantly affect the performance of the sequence directional elements on loaded systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.322
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it