Investigation of Cyclic Solvent Injection Process for Heavy Oil Recovery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper summarizes numerical and experimental simulation results of a cyclic solvent injection process study, which was part of a continuing investigation into the use of solvents as a follow up process in Cold Lake and Lloydminster reservoirs that have been pressure depleted by cold heavy oil production with sand (CHOPS). Typically only 5 – 10% of the original oil in place (OOIP) is recovered during cold production, so an effective follow-up process is required. The cyclic solvent injection (CSI) experiment consisted of primary production followed by 6 solvent (28% C3H8 – 72% CO2) injection cycles. Oil recovery after primary production and six solvent cycles was 50%, which indicates the potential viability of the CSI process. Concurrently with the laboratory physical simulation, a numerical simulation model was developed to represent the physical behavior of the experimental results. A history match of the primary production portion of the experiment was obtained using an Alberta Research Council foamy oil model. This resulted in the characterization (fluid saturations and pressures) of the oil sand pack at the start of the solvent injection process. The history match of the subsequent 6 solvent injection cycles was used to validate the numerical model of the CSI process developed at the Alberta Research Council. This model includes non-equilibrium rate equations that simulated the delay in solvent reaching its equilibrium concentration as it dissolves or exsolves in the oil in response to changes in the pressure and/or gas phase composition. Dissolution of CH4, C3H8, and CO2 in oil and CO2 in water were considered, as was exsolution of CH4, C3H8, and CO2 from oil and CO2 from water. Reduced gas phase permeabilities resulting from gas exsolution were also included. The history match simulations indicated that:The important mechanisms were represented in the simulationsSignificant oil swelling by solvent dissolution occurs during solvent injection periods. This can reduce solvent injectivity and penetration into a heavy oil reservoir during solvent injection periodsLow oil and gas phase relative permeabilities are required during production periods to match the experimental oil and gas production during solvent cycles A parametric simulation study showed that the quantity of gas injected in an injection period was relatively insensitive to the oil phase diffusion coefficients but was sensitive to solvent solubility in oil, dissolution rates, gas phase diffusion coefficients, molar densities in the oil phase, gas phase relative permeability, and capillary pressure. It was shown that oil production is highly dependent on how quickly solvent can dissolve in the oil during injection and exsolve from the oil during production. Introduction In Cold Lake and Lloydminster heavy oil reservoirs, cold production is used to increase heavy oil production rates by producing sand along with the oil. Sand production results in the creation of high permeability "wormholes" that enhance oil production. Following cold production, the pay zone has become a network of wormholes, which extend radially outward from production wells. During a follow-up process, these wormholes can provide reservoir access for an injection fluid such as solvent or steam.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it