MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992656560 · doi:10.1142/s0219265903000726

MESSY BROADCASTING IN MULTIDIMENSIONAL DIRECTED TORI

2003· article· en· W1992656560 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Interconnection Networks · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadcasting (networking)Computer scienceVertex (graph theory)Computer networkSet (abstract data type)TorusProcess (computing)Broadcast communication networkAtomic broadcastState (computer science)Distributed computingTheoretical computer scienceGraphAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In classical broadcast models, once a vertex receives the broadcast message, it sends the message out in such a way as to achieve the minimum possible broadcasting time. It is assumed either that there is a leader who coordinates the actions of all vertices during the broadcasting process, or that the vertices have a coordinated set of protocols which allow them to achieve minimum time broadcast for any originator. In the messy broadcast model, there is no leader, the vertices of the network do not know the starting time of the broadcast or the originator, the state of the whole scheme is unknown to any vertex, and the protocols are not coordinated. This model also describes a network with vertices that have small memories insufficient to store a set of coordinated protocols. In this paper, we continue the study of messy broadcasting and present the first results for directed graphs. We obtain exact values for and bounds on the messy broadcast times of multidimensional directed tori.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it