MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992891707 · doi:10.1109/itsc.2011.6083072

Vision-based detection and labelling of multiple vehicle parts

2011· article· en· W1992891707 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Object Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceA priori and a posterioriComputer visionKey (lock)Process (computing)Probabilistic logicTask (project management)Set (abstract data type)Construct (python library)Object detectionMachine visionMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a method for the visual detection of parts of interest on the outer surface of vehicles. The proposed method combines computer vision techniques and machine learning algorithms to process images of lateral views of automobiles. The aim of this approach is to determine the location of a set of car parts in ordinary scenes. The approach can be used in the intelligent transportation industry to construct advanced monitoring and security applications. The key contributions of this work are the introduction of a methodology to locate multiple patterns in cluttered scenes of vehicles which makes use of a probabilistic technique to reduce false detection, and the proposal of a method for inferring the location of regions of interest using a priori knowledge. The results demonstrate excellent performance in the task of detecting up to fourteen different car parts over a vehicle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Object Detection TechniquesFrench-language works237,207