MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992918041 · doi:10.1080/10543406.2011.610027

A Sieve Bootstrap Two-Sample<i>t</i>-Test Under Serial Correlation

2011· article· en· W1992918041 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of California, Irvine
KeywordsSieve (category theory)StatisticCorrelationTest statisticMathematicsAutocorrelationStatisticsProxy (statistics)AlgorithmComputer scienceStatistical hypothesis testingCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The classical two-sample t-test assumes that observations are independent. A violation of this assumption could lead to unreliable or even erroneous conclusions. However, in many biological studies, data are recorded over time and hence exhibit serial correlation. In order to take such temporal dependence into account, we suggest applying the sieve bootstrap method to generate replications of the observed data and then using these proxy-dependent processes to construct the empirical distribution for the t-statistic. The proposed method is fast, distribution-free, and well approximates the nominal significance level. We illustrate our approach in application to detection problem of brain activity in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and a longitudinal study of weight growth in rats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.320
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.126 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it